Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data based decision making
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 09:19, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Data based decision making (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear notable. Referenced to a very small number of academic papers from the mid to late 2000s/early 2010s, but I cursory searches don't lead me to any significant use of the term in the context of education. Article seems to be largely structured based on the ideas of the Bernhardt reference. I would assume these ideas were salient around the passage and initial implementation of the No Child Let Behind Act and not much beyond that. Maybe reduce to a paragraph or two and merge into the article for the law? William Graham talk 06:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. William Graham talk 06:58, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - it was a buzz phrase in the 2010s and has become a cliché by now, used exclusively at professional development workshops by education professors and principals, and still not covered in reliable secondary sources. An article about a rare eye disease might have that problem, and I’d still vote for keeping it, but this was just invented one day - and won’t go away. There’s a guy on Instagram that satirizes this sort of academic educationalese: "Find your rigor. Let’s take a deep dive into the data. What does Charlotte Danielson say?" Bearian (talk) 05:39, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.