Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Data Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Mz7 (talk) 22:26, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I ended up doing a WP:BOLD redirect to Ministry of Sound since there are so many backlinks to this article. The WP:REFUND still applies because it's a soft delete; if any editor wants the old history of the article restored, let me know, and I can do it in a jiffy. Mz7 (talk) 22:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Data Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subsidiary of the Ministry of Sound record label. It does not have significant in-depth coverage as required by WP:NCORP & WP:GNG. The only reliable source I've found about this label is a short paragraph by Resident Advisor [1]. It is not sufficient to pass the relevant notability guidelines. KingAndGod 13:22, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.