Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darrell Grams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:57, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Darrell Grams

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod removed without rationale or improvement. Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources to support meeting WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:45, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Nothing notable, this might be about him [1] briefly touching on the Ford lawsuit. Still a long way from notability. This reads like a resume instead of an article about a notable person. Oaktree b (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: "This article is associated with the extended Louton, Hughes, Oster, Rettinger, Ernst and Grams family involved in ministry, business and academia." Seems to be some attempt at creating a walled garden here. Oaktree b (talk) 20:35, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, Military, South Africa, Michigan, Nebraska, Texas, and Washington, D.C.. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:18, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Concur with Onel. Filled to the brim with original research, unreliable sources... it looks like a resume or family ancestry entry. A successful but non-notable (by our threshold) lawyer with no widespread coverage in independent secondary sources. GuardianH 12:53, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nomination and the arguments posted above, frustratingly Facebook links are used to support claims in the article... Nayyn (talk) 11:43, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.