Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danthree Studio

Danthree Studio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Danthree Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable via WP:RS, sources are not independent. Was in Draft as a paid article, it seems author insisted it go to mainspace, but I don't see enough reliable sources to demonstrate it passes WP:GNG Dennis Brown - 2¢ 09:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

• Delete. The references cited are pretty well uniformly promotion; none of them are independent sources. The article is essentially spam on a subject which does not satisfy the notability guidelines. JBW (talk) 11:13, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
• Delete. A lot of churnalism ad-style releases and simple trivial mentions in the sources but nothing that would meet all WP:SIRS for notability. The frustrating article history by a PAID editor is also insulting. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:05, 20 July 2025 (UTC)