Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danfoss Power Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:15, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Danfoss Power Solutions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Daughter company of Danfoss that has not received significant coverage in independent and reliable secondary sources. The current article cites just one source, which is a quarter review press release. A web search reveals only press releases, market reports, and other such sources that each fail at least one of those four criteria. The article has multiple issues, mostly because the article creator (who wrote the bulk of the prose in the current version of the article) seems to be an employee of this subsidiary. Earlier, I tried to copy-edit this mess of an article a little, but ultimately decided it was hopeless because I can't see how this company is notable in any way, shape or form. Ealuscerwen (talk) 02:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 02:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 02:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Ealuscerwen (talk) 02:07, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article is basically unsourced WP:OR that almost amounts to a WP:CRUFTed example of WP:NOT.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 23:14, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.