Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Matteucci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Matteucci

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable by WP:NACTOR or WP:BIO. Only minor or uncredited roles so far, and I can find no significant coverage from reliable sources in a WP:BEFORE search. Claim of "best actor" award won is vague and unsourced. Storchy (talk) 00:51, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Storchy (talk) 00:51, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bit parts, ACTOR not met. Well from his website "Dan Matteucci is currently the most notable actor, model, and an influencer in the American Entertainment industry " my emphasis. He's more notable than anyone else apparently. Or this nugget on influencive.com/commit-to-be-fit-a-guide-by-dan-matteucci/, which has been blacklisted and won't let me post the website link. This is far from GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I was planning to AfD this after tagging notability but Storchy beat me to it. The roles are minor and obviously fail WP:NACTOR, whereas GNG/BASIC is also failed. The references cited are databases, non-RS, promotional, routine non-SIGCOV press release-like piece, and a piece Dan himself wrote. My WP:BEFORE did not find sources contributing to GNG/BASIC, only trivial mentions. VickKiang (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A blacklisted source was a new one for me in AfD, guess that's another red flag. Oaktree b (talk) 04:48, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has not had a single significant named role. I see no evidence of notability after a search.Spiralwidget (talk) 15:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Internet. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no significance, no real coverage. --Mvqr (talk) 11:00, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.