Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DTDC
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Liz Read! Talk! 21:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DTDC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tthe article does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Bigneeerman (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bigneeerman (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Karnataka-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Doesnt seem notable. Will consider to change my vote if someone comes up with reliable sources. ChristinaNY (talk) 09:33, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I believe WP:CORPDEPTH is met between sources like [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] which carry sufficient independent and WP:SUSTAINED coverage on the company. M4DU7 (talk) 15:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.