Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuvva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cuvva

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There doesn't seem to be anything notable about the company. Its just an insurance app company. None of the sources establish anything. Plus, the article is seriously written as an advert. JaneciaTaylor (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. JaneciaTaylor (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep After two pages of Google searches I found the following, and they seem to meet WP:GNG. https://techcrunch.com/2019/12/03/cuvva-raises-15m/ https://www.eu-startups.com/2019/12/london-based-cuvva-raises-e17-5-million-series-a-funding-to-launch-new-pay-monthly-insurance-product/ https://www.altfi.com/article/5825_cuvva-appoints-lloyds-of-london-chairman-to-chair-its-board https://www.finextra.com/newsarticle/34550/lloyds-of-london-chair-joins-insurtech-startup-cuvva https://www.ft.com/content/3546c692-e9c4-11e9-a240-3b065ef5fc55 https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/motoring/pay-as-you-go-insurance-explained/ If a re-write is required, mark it as such. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Walter Görlitz, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources#TechCrunch says that there is no consensus that TechCrunch is a reliable source, and may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability. The author, Steve O'Hear is staff and he appears to declare his CoI. The extent to which the article is based on public relations material from Curvva is less clear. A LOT of it is just quoting the company. Is O'Hear actually doing any kind of reporting or analysis? I don't see it. Vexations (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Totally not notable. The TechCrunch article clearly doesn't cut it for the reasons given by Vexations. The citations to awards don't either. Which really doesn't leave much. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 22:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.