Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlisable

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g3, blatant hoax ("Old Norse"), author blocked for vandalism. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Controlisable

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and it is not a web directory. Access Denied – talk to me 00:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP is also not for incorrect BS etymologies. Drmies (talk) 00:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:DICDEF. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 00:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per not a dictionary. (word has no ghits, does it even really exist?) OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 01:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete DICTDEF, etc. Please prod next time or find a sympathetic admin to IAR delete in the spirit of WP:NOT. /ƒETCH COMMS / 01:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, it doesn't exist, it's not from Old Norse, it's total BS--snow? speedy delete? any admins in the area? Drmies (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.