Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condiment king

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn. Article is a recreation, c.f. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condiment King and will be tagged with G4. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor ^Sing 12:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Condiment king

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deprodded stub on a non-notable fictional character, fails WP:NFICT. Sam Sailor ^Sing 08:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 08:58, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 08:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 08:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Sing 08:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as recreation, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Condiment King.--T. Anthony (talk) 10:33, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, T. Anthony. --Sam Sailor ^Sing 12:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily delete per above. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 11:53, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.