Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CompoSecure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:08, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CompoSecure

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is zero independent coverage of this company in reliable sources. A WP:BEFORE search returns numerous press releases about funding, stock market valuations, stock forecast, investment announcements, etc. The two articles from The Wall Street Journal are paid placements by Olmstead Williams Communications, which fails the WP:SIRS check. We are left with no independent sources with significant coverage of the company itself. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Business, Companies, and United States of America. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I also don't find anything this company has done that can be considered WP:NOTEWORTHY, so there's next to nothing to write about if the article was kept. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 15:58, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. I only found walls upon walls of press releases. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 16:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Barnt Toust 16:27, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per norm. Mistletoe-alert (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Just press releases, and regular stuff that isn't notable. Procyon117 (talk) 13:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Behappyyar (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.