Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CodeRush
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 02:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- CodeRush (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This had a failed PROD several years ago on the basis that the sources were quality enough to warrant an article. I don't think this is true. The sources are all primary (both now and at the time of the PROD), and the secondary sources I could find online were self-published blogs that do not meet the standard for reliability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Did not find sources that are independent and reliable for the subject. Fails WP:GNG. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 04:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Not seeing any WP:SIGCOV for this. Some mentions in .NET tutorial books but those are limited to "you can use this, moving on." StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 17:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.