Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cmus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Terrible deletion nomination. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:14, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cmus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability? TheAwesome Hwyh 19:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology, Computing, and Software. TheAwesome Hwyh 19:01, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can only find links to gethub and reddit, some videos on this software, nothing for reviews or anything we need for RS. Oaktree b (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources. Some blogs though, and a brief mention in a book. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:23, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no coverage in reliable sources; results give us unreliable websites and guides like [1] and [2]. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:52, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think keeping the article does not hurt anyone, I can also improve it if that is the issue. Please bare with me, I do not participate often in these discussions and do not know all the rules TarkinTor (talk) 12:22, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.