Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clickn kids
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Clickn kids (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this passes WP:CORP. The references in the article don't look reliable, and all I could find online were PR pieces. I do see a possible exception in this THE Journal issue (p. 116), but I can't see enough of the source to verify it, and even if it was a good reference it wouldn't be enough to prove notability by itself. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 15:31, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 15:37, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Like the nominator, I also come up empty handed (save some PR pieces and scant mention) when searching for something to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. JFHJr (㊟) 17:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Puff Piece --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.