Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chum Bucket (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (converse) 10:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Chum Bucket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article has no sources and currently fails WP:GNG. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 19:30, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 19:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: So what? SpongeBob is sadly notable, so the lack of sources in this sub-article tells me nothing.--Milowent • talkblp-r 05:56, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability is not inherited; not every fictional setting within a notable television program is notable. Without significant coverage in third-party sources, there's no way we can have a verifiable article on this topic. Powers T 20:57, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Powers. SpongeBob is notable, yes, but that does not mean we must have an article about every aspect of the character and its show, unless these aspects have received significant coverage by reliable third-party sources, which is not the case here. Maddox (talk) 16:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The fictional restaurant as a stand-alone article does not meet the general notability guideline and the article is a plot-only description of a fictional work. Jfgslo (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to SpongeBob SquarePants. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.