Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Program

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Metro School. v/r - T P 17:02, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Program

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability questionable, might be called Mosaic now. - Roy Boy 20:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article doesn't even make a claim of notability – this is an education system developed and used by only one school in Columbus, Ohio. A quick search reveals no sources. Has a whiff of promotion about it for the school in question. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 21:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none reliable source are established; and the article is written poorly. Regardless a sentences like: “Christopher Program has also in the past been involved in the Model United Nations as well as the Model United Arab Leagues.” have some potential to keep the article, unless good references are found. Alex^{discussion ★} 23:15, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sufficient assertion of notability, and I don't see any sign of rescuing it. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into The Metro School. See Metro - Mosaic and Educational Council websites. Quote from Metro School site: "Mosaic, formerly known as Christopher Program, was founded in 1990 and has been recognized as one of Ohio’s Best Practices by Ohio’s Education Partnership. " --George100 (talk) 16:40, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.