Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choobleh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Choobleh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, especially not for random slang words made up by soccer fans to refer to other teams. Mesoderm (talk) 03:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:04, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable neologism. Can this not be CSD'd on the grounds that there is no context in the article as to what the word means, why it is applied to a specific club. The article barely makes any sense as it is. Fenix down (talk) 10:44, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable term, not even worth putting in a dictionary. Giant Snowman 08:37, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and Giant. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 06:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.