Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatBot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Text (company). There seems to be a small consensus to Merge this articles as an ATD. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ChatBot

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similarly to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveChat (2nd nomination), with same rationale. All relevant, verifiable information can be merged into the parent company's article, Text (company). There is no need for a standalone article, as it constitutes WP:UNDUE emphasis on a topic with minimal, independent coverage. Chiserc (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products and Software. Chiserc (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:38, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Per nom; I don’t see why a particular non-notable product should have its own spin-off from its parent company— all sources seem WP:ROUTINE or again assumed from Text’s independent coverage. MayhemStoppingBy (talk) 16:26, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be kept 2405:6E00:62F:C187:E0F1:222E:F432:DDC (talk) 10:26, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Geschichte (talk) 07:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge verified content into parent article as above, which already has a relevant section at Text (company)#ChatBot. Does not seem to be sufficiently notable in its own right at this time but merge/rd seems like a suitable WP:ATD. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:31, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.