Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ch Moazzaam Ishaq (Artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doesn't appear like any of them are protected yet, so I guess I'll do that. ansh 666 07:03, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ch Moazzaam Ishaq (Artist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. cited sources are not reliable. previously created at Ch Moazzam Ishaq, Ch Moazzam Ishaq (Entertainer) and Draft:Ch Moazzam Ishaq. Saqib (talk) 04:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This line "and has won a lot of competitions for being the best artist of his school" just shouts to me "this person is not notable."John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:59, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 07:58, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 07:58, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This should be salted along with Ch Moazzam Ishaq, Ch Moazzam Ishaq (Entertainer), when deleted. --Saqib (talk) 09:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: (and SALT if needed): fails ARTIST and WP:GNG. Quis separabit? 17:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:09, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete purely promotional autobiography, no notability. sami ^talk 08:42, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and salt per user above, whose name is just too complicated for me to properly quote. I apologize. Ifnord (talk) 15:56, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.