Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Darcl Logistics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 11:12, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Darcl Logistics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks sufficient coverage from independent, reliable sources, failing to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the article primarily relies on self-published sources or promotional content, it would violate Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability standards. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Welcome to Pandora (talk) 14:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:10, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Pandora! I have made changes in the article. Adityasharma0701 (talk) 10:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:37, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep – I am not an expert in analyzing Indian sources, but the company seems to have the minimum notability for an article ([1], [2], [3]). If there is promotional content, it should be removed without prejudice to the existence of the article as a whole (WP:DINC). Svartner (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We need to see articles that contain in-depth information on the company which is created using independent content. The article from Rail Analysis is regurgitating from a tender document abd contains insufficient in-depth "independent content". The second is from a real-estate company that rented them some offices and contains boilerplate regurgitates company spiel, fails ORGIND. The final article is regurgitated PR with no ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:52, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 10:49, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Highly promotional article. CJ Darcl Logistics provides a broad range of services... Most of the references are just press releases or announcements. the coverage is typical sponsored churnalism lacking WP:CORPDEPTH. Bakhtar40 (talk) 18:19, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: References are press releases, announcements and churnalism. The article sounds promotional and has many sections that are unnecessary.Mysecretgarden (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Based on the recent changes, I believe the article follows the wikipedia guidelines with adequate information.Thanks!Rachitmisr (talk) 11:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep article needs work but the subject fulfills Wikipedia's notability requirements as per WP:ORG and has been updated since the nomination as per WP:HEY Nayyn (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. It looks like the improvements to this article involved the removal of inappropriate content, not the addition of new sources.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - CJ Darcl Logistics is a notable Indian logistics company with a significant history since its founding in 1986. Evidenced by its revenue of ₹4,594.5 crore (US$540 million) in FY24 and a large number of employees (6000+), CJ Darcl Logistics has a substantial presence in the logistics industry. Partnerships with major companies like Tata Motors and IndoSpace further support its notability.--Hka-34 Jyli (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional fluff proped up by new accounts !voting keep. This sort of scenario almost always has an ulterior motive to it. Just no. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:51, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Notably, none of the Keep !voters have addressed this elephant in the room - which sources (and which paragraphs within those sources) contain content that meets NCORP? HighKing⁺⁺ 12:53, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.