Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bud and Lou

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Harley Quinn#Bud and Lou. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:15, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bud and Lou

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A pair of minor characters from the DC Comics continuity. Both have very little coverage, and absolutely no SIGCOV I can find barring ROUTINE announcements of returns. A complete failure of GNG. A possible AtD could be to Harley Quinn, given she is their owner. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:33, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Television, and Comics and animation. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:33, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see a need for a redirect since I can't see anyone wanting to search for two hyenas. Rhino131 (talk) 17:25, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge with their section at Harley Quinn in the spirit of WP:PRESERVE. --Rtkat3 (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (with a possible rename?) to Harley Quinn#Bud and Lou - Minor characters that do not have the significant coverage in reliable sources to pass the WP:GNG, so suggesting keeping without some kind of actual argument or explanation is out of the question. I would not be opposed to merging a brief description to the appropriate section of Harley's article, since it is currently empty save a link here. Though, if done, I might suggest renaming the redirect there to Bud and Lou (comics), and having this space redirect to Abbott and Costello instead. Rorshacma (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.