Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BostonDirtDogs.com (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Pastor Theo (talk) 11:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- BostonDirtDogs.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources given, no establishment of notability. Seems like mostly original research and work drawn from primary sources. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 19:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. --Giants27 (c|s) 20:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unreferenced and non-notable. Most of the content is OR.--Giants27 (c|s) 20:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for the reasons already mentioned. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nothing to indicate notability. Sports web site cruft. Wknight94 talk 21:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 22:24, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Boston Globe, which owns this website. It is a rambling original essay, not an encyclopedia article. No assertion of importance or significance. Drawn Some (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.