Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Baseball
| Points of interest related to Baseball on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do |
This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Baseball. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
- Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Baseball|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Baseball. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Sports.
| watch |
Many of the baseball-related deletion discussions center on questions of notability. In this case, the guideline Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Notability (WP:BASE/N) may be helpful.
Baseball
[edit]Articles for deletion
[edit]- Stephen Kahn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page is for a baseball player who did not reach a top league (he reached Double-A) or play in a top international tournament (he was on a collegiate national team).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sloopyploop (talk • contribs) 13:47, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. Sloopyploop (talk)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 November 7. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and California. Shellwood (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT criteria 1. Nominator has not made a deletion rationale based on anything at WP:DEL-REASON, or based on any criteria at WP:Notability or WP:NSPORT or WP:NOT. We don't delete biography articles because a subject hasn't reached some arbitrary bar of achievement. Our inclusion criteria is based on other measurements such as sourcing. The nominator hasn't made their case based on something actionable.4meter4 (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Golden pitch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is not a notable term or concept. WP:RECENTISM given the 2025 World Series is at play. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Baseball. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: I have added a number of additional sources to this page, going back to 2016 when the phrase was coined, and including additional sources outside of the original research paper. Doffbhoya123 (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Sourcing might be recent in the article, but there are mentions of the term from 2023, 2018 [1], [2]. The second source in particular has a bibliography that seems to go back to the 1920s, suggesting a long history of the term. Oaktree b (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: A whole academic paper on the subject, from 2016 [3] Oaktree b (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Plenty of history behind the term. LionTank (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Do not comment on these articles here. If you agree with the proposed deletion, you don't have to do anything. If you think the article merits keeping, the remove the {{prod}} template and make an effort to improve the article so that it clearly meets the notability and verifiability criteria.