Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borealis (software company)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Borealis (software company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The organisation is not meeting GNG and NCORP as it has only dependent media links and press-releases Norlk (talk) 12:35, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:44, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: There is also a Draft:Borealis (software company) which was declined at AfC later in the day after this copy had been placed in mainspace. AllyD (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: This is a brochure-like article about a company's product proposition, supported by listings, announcement-based and passing mention references. As it stands, it lacks the coverage needed to demonstrate notability. Possibly, though, the user's Draft can be left for them to develop, with the proviso that it would have to be submitted through AfC and not simply moved/copied again into mainspace. AllyD (talk) 12:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.