Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitflu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bitflu

Being unable to find any third-party sources, I believe this is not notable enough for inclusion. Otterathome (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. One of (probably quite a few) torrent clients with HTML interface and usable as a server.--Oneiros (talk) 15:04, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a honest attempt to keep the article by Otterathome: No tagging for problems. Keep and tag.--Oneiros (talk) 12:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good job failing WP:AGF, if it's notable then you will have no problem finding third-party sources for it.--Otterathome (talk) 12:04, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing special. Not notable. Miami33139 (talk) 00:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How many other actively maintained torrent clients for Unix with an HTML interface are there?--Oneiros (talk) 00:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:35, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not seeing much coverage. Gigs (talk) 02:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.