Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BigMuscle.com
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- BigMuscle.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NWEB and WP:GNG. Was unable to locate any reliable sources that provide in-depth information about the website on google. Vozul (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Vozul (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Sexuality and gender. - "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (work / talk) 04:37, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: No NCORP sources. Levivich (talk) 16:13, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.