Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basir Ahang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 03:36, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basir Ahang

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability Hazara Birar ^(Talk) 01:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I can go to page 10 on Google and still find decent coverage. The article could use some expansion, but it's well sourced, and I have no issue with notability on this article Mr.weedle (talk) 02:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable. Got significant coverage as well [1] [[1]]. Fifthapril (talk) 04:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source check The smartphones chapter is trivial coverage (about a film he made, not himself), but the Al Jazeera article does have significant information, namely the phrases "Basir Ahang is an independent Afghan journalist specialising in asylum and refugee issues" and "Ahang, himself a one-time asylum seeker". — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for the response and I appreciate it. I agree that this is a trivial coverage and I only added it because he was mentioned 2-3 times. Fifthapril (talk) 04:03, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Journalism, Poetry, and Afghanistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article is notable and the activist's coverage exceed BLP notability requirements. Lalalala — Preceding undated comment added 01:08, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. While there seems to be a consensus to Keep, there are questions about whether the sources found are substantial enough.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article is fine as it is for the most part, and the person seems notable enough. --WR 23:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Lots of coverage that I can find; passes WP:GNG. Uhai (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.