Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Basic Shape

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Per WP:SPEEDYKEEP#1. The nominator has withdrawn their nomination and there are no other rationale for deletion. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basic Shape

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~There is some coverage, but I don't think it is enough to establish that they meet WP:GNG or WP:NBAND. Boleyn (talk) 16:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NBAND. I've added content and references. Subject had album reviews, they toured Australia and their music was played on national radio.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:24, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, is now properly referenced and satisfies the requirements of WP:NBAND. Dan arndt (talk) 08:17, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination I am happy to be proved wrong, and have removed the notability tag too. Thanks for your hard work. Boleyn (talk) 09:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.