Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baakiyalakshmi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baakiyalakshmi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient references, fails WP:GNG and WP:RPRGM, and WP:SIGCOV Tirishan (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. Tirishan (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:GNG have added references from News18 India [1], The Times of India [2], The Times of India [3], IMDb [4], and Official Disney+ Hotstar Ott Website [5] and more coverage in Tamil language.--P.Karthik.95 (talk) 09:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Source 1 is from a self-published source whose expertise is unknown, and is only routine coverage on the serial starting
- Source 2 routine promotional coverage on the serial starting
- Source 3 is routine plot updates
- Source 4 is routine updates on one actress' birthday
- Source 5 is also routine plot updates (link 16)
- Source 6 is routine updates on actress replacement
- Source 7 is routine updates on actor announcing leaving
- Source 8 is routine updates on actor leaving
- Source 9 is routine updates on actor leaving
- Source 10 is promotional coverage on an actress' Instagram posts
This reply's link 17 is completely unrelated, link 18 is an WP:IMDB source, and link 19 is the serial's page on Hotstar. None of this shows how the serial is notable for Wikipedia Karnataka (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - one of Vijay TV’s top serials with a lot of coverage. look it up and there’s about 300 articles in english, in tamil probably the same if not a fair bit more Aspiringeditor1 (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the source analysis above, nothing else found we can use. Oaktree b (talk) 00:54, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Out of all the television series, you nominated this is actually a well known one. What kinds of sources are you looking for? DareshMohan (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It does cite it's notability. CastJared (talk) 15:42, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
please explain Karnataka (talk) 18:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. While those advocating Keep are in the majority, they haven't done a good job refuting criticism of the newly found sources in the source analysis. We can't just rely on a subject being called well-known, we need evidence of their notability in reliable sources with SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft space, probably significant enough based on referencing coverage (even if sources are "routine") but article could use quality improvement. - Indefensible (talk) 02:45, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per prior relist comment above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:53, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - 63 sources found from The Times of India. 2 pages of articles found from The Indian Express. Tons of articles from Oneindia. DareshMohan (talk) 06:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.