Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autopix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per consensus. If this comes up again, please scrutinize the sources. The fake references are disturbing, indeed. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 07:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopix

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence found of any notability. Sources seem to be added randomly, e.g. "In 2018, 3sixtyfactory project was joined by Adam Finch." is sourced to this from 2011 which mentions nothing about any of this, and "In 2022, 3sixtyfactory merged with Autopix as one company. Autopix offers free training in technology and innovation, to people facing financial hardship in the Philippines." is sourced to this book from 2013 which again has no information on autopix or 3sixtyfactory or Bakke, never mind about what happened in the Philippines in 2022 obviously. While I can't access the 2022 version of the book used as source 2, the 2013 version again doesn't mention either the prof or his software. Looking for better sources only produced primary sources. Fram (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Photography, Software, and Norway. Fram (talk) 09:10, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with sourcing/citation style concerns - additionally there's next to nothing out there that contributes to any case for notability for this mobile app based retouching service. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify I ask to move to draft and give some time to work on it. There are printed books and magazines with this software. I will have time later to citate the page with those sources. --Lucky Namrd (talk) 12:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Then you should have waited to create this page until you had these, instead of falsifying sources. Anyway, you could at least give us some titles of these books surely? You have a week. Fram (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable software company --Morpho achilles (talk) 12:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The fake referencing is truly disturbing. Aside from that, the subject of the article does not meet WP criteria for notability, and therefore should not be retained in the encyclopedia. I'm not finding that the software, nor the company meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Netherzone (talk) 00:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.