Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AudioSoft

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:24, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AudioSoft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This business doesn't seem to be Notable as AudioSoft, Ultra Electronics AudioSoft or Ultra Electronics Network Analytics. Stesmo (talk) 22:29, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (inform) @ 16:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: An article which was created and expanded by several WP:SPA accounts - describing what the firm did but not demonstrating notability. I can find very little coverage of it in its lifespan, other than reporting when it was taken over. It is now a business unit of Ultra Electronics so unlikely to gather more coverage under the former name. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.