Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asif Mohiuddin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asif Mohiuddin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:1E, this article reads like a prose resume, this person is notable only for a single event, otherwise it can entirely be covered in Attacks on secularists in Bangladesh. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable for multiple reasons. Bobs and Anna Politkovskaya Award winner. Also for the attacks on him and imprisonment. Mentioned in numerous national and international sources. - Mar11 (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it is definitely not 1E. He is one of the leading atheist blogger/activist from Bangladesh. We have tried before to cover him entirely on Attacks on secularists in Bangladesh, but he can't be fully covered there. --nafSadh did say 20:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: 3 other bloggers were also arrested.why only asif mohiuddin should have a article?where is is complete biography.when was he born.where did he study.anything?something.too much lack of information --Souravdgx (talk) 21:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Souravdgx (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 10:45, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Coverage in reliable, secondary sources is available and referenced to a degree that confirms subject fulfills WP:BASIC. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 15:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.