Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtiosCAD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. ✗plicit 03:18, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArtiosCAD

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but doesn't have the depth of coverage to meet WP:N. Boleyn (talk) 11:11, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software, Belgium, United States of America, and Massachusetts. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 16:36, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn, just ckecking to be sure you reviewed the 5 sources I suggested on the talk page when I deprodded. ~Kvng (talk) 13:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Review of the sources posted to the talk page would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 14:58, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per User:Kvng's sources. The level of coverage narrowly meets WP:NPRODUCT. Lovelyfurball (talk) 13:19, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 16:43, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per Lovelyfurball and Kvng. Andre🚐 08:24, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.