Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AquaB

AquaB

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

it fails to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines. Oia-pop (talk) 05:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Oia-pop (talk) 05:38, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:51, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a false and baseless nomination that should be withdrawn. The article clearly meets Wikipedia’s notability standards, and I have since added multiple new, verifiable, and independent sources to further strengthen its reliability and alignment with WP:GNG

You are a new or relatively inactive account that appears to be nominating articles without sufficient understanding of notability criteria or proper engagement with the article’s actual content and sourcing. Wikipedia encourages constructive editing and improvement — not careless deletion nominations.

Per WP:BEFORE and WP:NOT, deletion should never be the first step when an article is clearly improvable and well-sourced, as is the case here. I strongly urge administrators and editors to dismiss this nomination and focus instead on collaborative improvements where needed. Sterling44 (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]