Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apidog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 19:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apidog

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable software/software company COOLIDICAE🕶 18:14, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: If we look at the sources, they are neither reliable nor independent. Such random websites have been presented as sources, fails WP:NCORP. Baqi:) (talk) 18:27, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Blocked sock. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 05:12, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ORGCRIT.4meter4 (talk) 20:06, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:44, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:NCORP. Halley ^{luv Filipino ❤} (Talk) 09:52, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does fail WP:NCORP. Would need more and better sources in order to pass. Iljhgtn (talk) 05:21, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.