Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apex Professional University

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing based on the last word from Bearian. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apex Professional University

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article provides no evidence of notability, makes use of advertising language for its lead, and after some looking, I can't seem to find any RS neutral coverage of it that would help it satisfy WP:GNG (Please double-check that part, this is an indian university, and I imagine there may be a non-english article on it.) MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 13:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I as well had trouble finding WP:RS using search engines, although I also did not peruse local press without English translations available. JamieWhat (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is it acredited or not? See WP:NSCHOOL. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:09, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting due to questions presented by Piotrus and to encourage more participation. Thanks everyone for your participation and assuming good faith!
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:30, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I hate to say this, but it reads like this is a diploma mill or seminary for vedic science. If it's not, then the article needs to be done over from scratch. Bearian (talk) 16:11, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.