Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Neitzel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Andreas Neitzel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A biographical article without serious info about the person behind the sporter. The Banner talk 15:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep Are you serious; with your experience? That has never been a guideline. Notable, see WP:NOLYMPICS. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:46, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note nominater has already been told many times to read WP:before. Sander.v.Ginkel ^(Talk) 15:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 17:30, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to meet the WP:NOLYMPICS requirements. Ejgreen77 (talk) 00:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this subject is a notable sportsperson as they have competed in the Olympic games. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- And in case anyone thinks that this subject is too short for Wikipedia, most entries in paper encyclopedias are the same size. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 10:13, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NOLY. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:25, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:NOLYMPICS, a bit of WP:BEFORE would have been nice. Coolabahapple (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.