Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammini College of Engineering
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 11:59, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ammini College of Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No independent relibale sources to establish notability and nothing was found on doing WP:Before. Clearly fails GNG Kichu🐘 Need any help? 05:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 05:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 05:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 05:50, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:21, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No RS with a BEFORE. Fails NSCHOOLS. Vikram Vincent 19:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, a non-notable college. It only exist on its official website and the school/collage database websites (WP:USESPS) identical to edu database-searches such as ICBSE and OutlookIndia [1], [2]. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 20:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There isn't even the usual trivial sources about this that exist for some school. Let alone anything in-depth. So, the article should clearly be deleted. Unless someone can find WP:THREE in-depth, reliable, non-trivial, independent sources so it will pass WP:NORG. I'm more then happy change my vote to keep if anyone can. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.