Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alisson gothz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alisson gothz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biography of a Brazilian visual artist reads like an advertisement and desperately needs to be rewritten. But I'm not convinced rewriting this article would be worth the effort; the subject appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 00:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agreed fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Interesting subject, but issues with WP:V and notability. An "artist statement"? Sounds more like self-promotion. Brumak (talk) 06:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, gotta agree with nom. I doubt the pages notability and verifiability, and I think it fails WP:GNG. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 16:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.