Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex O'Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List_of_The_Mummy_characters#Alexander_'Alex'_O'Connell (effectively redirect as information is already in target article). I have also moved the redirect and dabbed. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alex O'Connell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This The Mummy character fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix (talk) 23:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and/or merge to List_of_characters in The Mummy series where this character is already described and has whatever notability he might as part of the series. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to List_of_characters in The Mummy series. I am a little concerned that a real person, an Olympic fencer by the same name, has to play second fiddle to a fictional character. Abductive (reasoning) 23:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps the article can be moved to Alex O'Connell (fictional character) before then setting as a redirect? No need for a real Alex to play second fiddle to a fictional one. Or how about a dab page? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dab is cleaner. Abductive (reasoning) 18:45, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.