Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airy (software) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Airy (software)

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was clearly written by the company who created the software. The software itself is also most likely malicious, the possibility of which is mentioned nowhere on the page. It's also not significant enough to have a Wikipedia article, which is made apparent by the lack of real references (note: looking back, it also seems to cite a lot of fake reviews that I noticed while checking out the product for myself). This is clearly just a company trying to sell its sketchy PUP to people looking it up on Wikipedia to tell if it's legitimate or not. After looking through the article, it's most likely that the latter is the case. -A Fluffy Kitteh | FluffyKittehz User Profile Page 22:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -A Fluffy Kitteh | FluffyKittehz User Profile Page 22:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as expressed by the nominator, this article is clearly an ad for the software creator. Not many reputable sources either. 22:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC) Frigyes06 (talk) 22:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:06, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't see any non-trivial/non-routine coverage from solid sources aside from this article brought up in the previous AFD, which isn't enough on its own to keep. Tollens (talk) 08:49, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No significant, independent coverage. Mooonswimmer 00:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.