Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Cleaner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:46, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Cleaner

Declining db-spam; article isn't promoting anything, but any article by a brand-new contributor that talks about warez is potentially dangerous, so taking to AfD. Maybe it's fine, but if it's not, we want to delete it sooner than 7 days, so make sure you mention "speedy" if your vote is for speedy deletion. Note that the previous version of this article by the same editor contained code and a link to their myspace page. - Dank (push to talk) 21:46, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 21:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete on WP:N basis. Wikipedia is not a malware database. Non-notable malware that neither Mcafee nor Symantec could be bothered to create more than a paragraph on. Paleking (talk) 17:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, because this software doesn't seem to be notable (as malware or otherwise). Also unsourced. TheFeds 01:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Malware of this type tends to be highly polymorphic, containing hooks for distributors to give it a new name and appearance at a moment's notice - as such, individual variants aren't notable, although the family might be. See Rogue security software for details. Zetawoof_(ζ) 16:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.