Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdroitLogic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AdroitLogic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NCORP; indeed, some of the citations are from PRWeb. Chris Troutman (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 22:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not at all convincing for any applicable notability, not yet acceptable. I myself encountered this at New Pages. SwisterTwister talk 20:45, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. not notable. Insert CleverPhrase Here 00:29, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete full of questionable sources. Fails WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 10:19, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.