Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adaptive Server Enterprise
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 21:35, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
- Adaptive Server Enterprise (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
GNG failing advert Mr. Guye (talk) 00:56, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:33, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (articulate) @ 17:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Disagree This system seems notable enough to me. There is this book, this video made by another company, and the google results show other connections with other companies. − Pintoch (talk) 10:10, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 12:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: A database product line preceding and then alongside the branch of Microsoft SQL Server, which I think gives enough importance to justify an article here. Several book refs added. AllyD (talk) 16:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.