Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Bashir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Bashir

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff-piece promoting a male model. Article was in PROD and creator removed PROD tag adding some non-RS sources like Facebook and a "Vote for Model of the Week"poll in fan-sites like Vampirefreaks.com Alexf^(talk) 14:47, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete It is a puff-piece. Half the sources are dead links. Web lookup points to WP. Self referential puff piece by aspiring model. Fails WP:BIO scope_creep (talk) 23:49, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom. The only reason I did not speedy deleted on sight was because it had gone to PROD and had to be brought to AfD to follow due process. It is obviously a fan-joke if you see the removed text and the attempts from IPs to "fix" it. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.