Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATM Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:38, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ATM Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As written, does not meet WP:Notability guidelines; lacks WP:CORPDEPTH, and is another example of WP:CORPSPAM that slipped through the cracks. Additionally, it has no prospect of future notability as it was acquired by Cardtronics, which, in turn, does not even have a Wikipedia page because it may or may not be notable. As well, a Google advanced phrase search for "ATM Network" or "ATM Network" + "Phil Rock" (the company's apparent founder) reveals only a few results, most of which are either circular sources to blogs and digital-only pseudo-news publications. Coverage is nearly non-existent and often the sort of trivial, non-significant matters. As such, fails WP:SIG. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Added comment - I notified the page creator, so I checked out their profile, and found their account was blocked by an administrator following a WP:Sockpuppet investigation. Doug Mehus (talk) 21:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP; the only source available online is their website, and coverage by secondary sources is non-existent. Also clear WP:CORPSPAM. Luke ^Talk 21:58, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP and GNG. I cannot find any "independent content" references, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete none of the sources meet the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. Andrew Base (talk) 05:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.