Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIPCC Energy (Edo Refinery)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AIPCC Energy (Edo Refinery)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable: the company, while involved in significant industrial activities, doen't meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines (there are not enough independent, reliable secondary sources that discuss the company in significant detail). LusikSnusik (talk) 14:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Nigeria. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I left a notification at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Energy. —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 16:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable, lack of notable sources. Salsakesh (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Edo refineries (there are two). I don't find that AIPCC is notable, but the refineries are. There's a fair amount of information about it, (some of which doesn't mention AIPCC) and the refineries are a big issue in Edo state.[1] Larataguera (talk) 22:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:18, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.