Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/42Q

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

42Q

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All sources are churnalism or affiliated. Parent company has no article. Content is basically a business directory entry (see WP:NOTDIR), and the claim of notability is by inheritance. Guy (Help!) 14:23, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:ORG, doesn't have notable independent coverage. The Forbes article about it is paid partner content, and the other websites don't seem to be very reliable or independent. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!} 06:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mostly PR pieces found online. Lapablo (talk) 21:33, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Poor quality sources that do not demonstrate notability. Cindlevet (talk) 19:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.