Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019 Tell Rifaat clashes
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:50, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- 2019 Tell Rifaat clashes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very minor/insignificant clash rather than a battle, and a part of Operation Olive Branch. Recommend that it be merged and later deleted. KasimMejia (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per Wikipedia:Article size, Operation Olive Branch is already very large and already over 100 kb, and this article has enough sources to establish notability.
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:46, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - "Very minor" according to who? Besides, Operation Olive Branch sorely needs more sub-articles like this one. Mikrobølgeovn (talk) 01:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The deletion reason (and discussion) seems to be whether it's a legitimate content fork
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Relisting comment: The deletion reason (and discussion) seems to be whether it's a legitimate content fork
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 23:19, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
*Delete/Merge This was a small clash as part of the larger Operation Olive Branch that resulted in 3 villages changing hands back and forth in one day. Having a separate article for insignificant clashes like these in the Syrian Civil War does not improve readability WP:CONTENTFORK. KasimMejia (talk) 07:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Self Comment Another thing to note, the article was created immediately when the clash began and 3 villages were captured. The creator fell into WP:TOOSOON thinking the offensive would result in a large battle WP:CBALL. KasimMejia (talk) 09:55, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep notable and because of Wikipedia:Article size, Operation Olive Branch is already unwieldy it is a poor idea to merge. Wm335td (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 10:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Britishfinance (talk) 10:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep There are RS to treat this as a separate article. The connection between the articles should be made clearer here, however. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.