Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'Pirena'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Only keep argument is not addressing the deletion reason. Seems like a redirect already exists and people think no more are needed, thus deleting. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'Pirena'

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable notability per WP:GNG. A fictional character from a notable TV series. Pirena, the correct title, is already a redirect to Encantadia (see also Pirena revision history and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirena). Whether or not this character merits a separate article, the incorrect title with extraneous quotation marks should probably not remain. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:50, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Enough notabilityIslelaud96 (talk) 04:01, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:13, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious DELETE – The existing redirect is sufficient. —jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:06, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Encantadia per nom. Hiding T 14:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above. A redirect would not be useful in this case for obvious reasons. Josh Milburn (talk) 20:16, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the reasons already stated above. Aoba47 (talk) 21:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.